No Labels wants to be recognized as a political party in NC. Democrats are skeptical – WRAL News

RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina elections officials are facing an unusual decision: Whether to recognize a political group called No Labels as a political party. The unusual part: The group’s own founder says it isn’t a party.

No Labels is a 501c4 “social welfare” group, a campaign finance classification that also covers most traditional political action committees. The group petitioned the state board of elections for recognition as a political party earlier this year. The recognition would give the group the ability to place candidates on statewide ballots.

As a 501c4, it doesn’t have to disclose its donors, unlike political parties. That’s why some detractors have called No Labels a “dark money” group.

Many Democrats have been openly skeptical about the group, saying it’s setting up a spoiler ticket that could divide the vote of moderate Democrats and hand the 2024 election to the Republican front-runner, former President Donald Trump.

The North Carolina State Board of Elections is expected to vote on whether to recognize No Labels Sunday at an annual state conference of election officials.

‘Insurance policy’

The group’s CEO and founder Nancy Jacobson told NBC News July 18 that No Labels is seeking ballot access as a political party because they want to be able to hold a space on the ballot for a bipartisan ticket — but only if the nominees of the major parties don’t fare well in public approval polls.

“This is an insurance policy, maybe to be used, maybe not to be used,” Jacobson told NBC. “Maybe at the end of the day, all we’re doing is building a movement.”

Jacobson insisted that the group would not act as a spoiler and would only mount a ticket if there’s a real chance of victory. But she wouldn’t say under what circumstances the group would take its name off the ballot.

She pointed to polling that shows low public approval ratings for the presumptive front-runners of both major parties, Trump and President Joe Biden.

“If we come to April and the American people want another choice,” Jacobson said, “shouldn’t the American people have the chance for another choice?”

Jacobson said the group is close to meeting its fundraising goal of $70 million to get the party on the ballot in all 50 states. But she declined to disclose the donors of that money, something other political parties are required to do.

“We’re not a party,” she said, saying the group is pursuing recognition as a party only because that’s what many states require for ballot access.

“That’s just language,” Jacobson said.

State board questions and pushback

North Carolina’s elections board, which is controlled by Democrats, has had a lot of questions for No Labels in its efforts to get onto the 2024 ballot — more questions than other third-party applicants have had to answer, attorneys for the group say.

State law requires new parties to gather thousands of signatures on petitions to qualify for recognition. Many of the board’s queries to date have focused on what No Labels instructed its paid signature gatherers to tell voters about “the general purpose and intent of the new party.”

Jacobson’s NBC interview sparked another round of questioning. In a letter this week, state elections board attorney Paul Cox asked No Labels’ attorney, former state Supreme Court Justice Bob Orr, to explain whether petition signers were told that the group isn’t truly a political party. He also asked for an explanation of the relationship between the national No Labels, which says it isn’t a political party, and the state group seeking recognition as just that.

In a press release Thursday, the group reiterated that it is not a political party, but accused the board of “operating outside of state law” by refusing to recognize them as such. Lawyers for No Labels, meanwhile, have accused the state elections board of delaying their approval vote.

“I remain gravely concerned that the board is playing partisan politics with North Carolinians’ constitutional right to ballot access, and urge them to refrain from engaging in any form of voter suppression,” Benjamin Chavis, a civil rights leader associated with the group, said in the statement.

The state board of elections declined to comment on the allegations.

“It would be premature to comment on a matter that the State Board has not yet decided,” said NCSBE spokesman Patrick Gannon.

Source link

Source: News

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *